April 17, 2012, [MD]
Two perspectives on Open Access promotion
There are two different ways of promoting Open Access publishing to academic authors, and also two different perspectives from which to conduct research. The first is to say that the current system is wonderful, but many people are locked out – academics at smaller institutions, teachers and school administrations, the public, etc. Our goal in this case would be to give everyone in the world access to download PDFs from Elsevier and Springer, and the research would largely be policy-related.
Another perspective would be to ask: What new ways of interacting with publications can be enabled by Open Access, which are impossible with Toll Access journals, even those for which you have paid subscription fees. I believe this is in some ways a more compelling story for many authors, because the first argument is largely based on charity – they might think that they themselves, and all their friends at elite universities, all have access. However, the second approach is to show how Open Access can make your research work easier and faster, even when you are at an elite institution.
Of course, the extent to which innovative new workflows and analyses can be implemented also depend on the "degree" of openess, given that the term Open Access covers a wide array of cases. The minimal (but also the most common) case is to expect the ability to download a PDF without logging in, or paying money. The ideal case would be a Creative Commons-licensed article, preferably in a semantic open text-based format (not PDF), with machine-readable metadata, linked datasets, semantic citations, etc.
I have spent a lot of time pushing for policy change around OA, and I am in awe of what we have already accomplished, and I also know we have a lot left to do. However, I feel that the OA community has not sufficiently addressed this other technical part, and I believe increasing the use-value of OA journals can do a lot to convince academics to become more active with self-archiving etc.
I mentioned a number of dimensions of openness above, but even with just the PDF file available, there are things we can do. When I see a citation in a journal article, on a social citation sharing website, or on somebody's blog or wiki, which I find interesting, what is the first thing I want to do? Import the citation and the PDF into my citation manager.
If you are really lucky, the location that posted the citation also offers machine-readable metadata, such as BibTeX. However, there is very seldom any distinction made between OA and non-OA publications – in both cases, the PDFs are not hosted on the site, because of copyright issues (which is correct in most cases, since a very small percentage of OA articles are openly licensed). Sadly, it is very rare that the metadata contains a link to download the PDF, even though theoretically, that would actually be the most important part of the metadata. (After all, the reason we create such standardized formatting schemes is to make it easy for other people to locate the article we cited).
And the few times the URL field in a BibTeX entry is filled in, it goes to an abstract page, from which we can download the PDF. The same is true for DOI, which always resolves to an HTML abstract page, and almost never to the actual publication – even when the publication is OA, and can be downloaded without login, etc.
Initially, Researchr was no distinction. I simply captured the BibTeX offered by Google Scholar, or other sites. Of course, I always endeavored to find the PDF and download for my own purposes, but I was not able to share these online, because of copyright. Thus, an article page on my wiki for an OA article, would look identical to that of a TA article, and users would have to copy the title into Google Scholar to locate the PDF.
I really wanted to change this, and thought about ways of automatically capturing the download URL when importing PDFs. It turns out there is a very elegant solution – OSX Finder stores the download URL as part of a file's metadata, even when using Chrome.
We can easily access this information through the command line
mdls -name kMDItemWhereFroms FILENAME
Thus I could easily add this URL to the citation's metadata, tag it as Open Access, display this in various ways in the wiki, etc.
However, was the file really Open Access? If I am sitting at the University of Toronto, I can download PDFs from all the big publishers, because they have "whitelisted" the IP ranges belonging to the University of Toronto. However, these PDFs are not available outside of the university. How to distinguish?
I wrote a tiny little API, which I uploaded to my public server, which sits outside of University of Toronto, and does not have any special privileges. It accepts a URL as an argument, and attempts to download the header of that URL (ie. even though the PDF might be 5MB, it will only download a few hundred bytes). It checks whether the URL accepts at all, and whether it is of the kind "PDF" (ie. it's not an HTML abstract page).
If successful, it simply returns "true", and the URL is added to the file's metadata.
So far, I have not done anything specific to display this fact, although the citation template automatically displays the contents of the URL field in the citation.
Eventually, I want to make a big nice (green?) icon next to this metadata field saying "PDF Download" or something similar. However, since the URL field is also present in the hidden machine-readable metadata field below, we are able to do some fun stuff.
I traditionally used Ctrl+Alt+Cmd+B as a shortcut to grab a citation from Google Scholar. I enhanced this script to also look for the hidden BibTeX on a Researchr wiki page. If it finds it, it imports it into BibDesk. If it also finds a URL field, it attempts to automatically download the PDF, and autolink it to the citation in BibDesk.
I further had some fun with the page numbers from the raw clippings – if you press a page number on somebody else's wiki, and the metadata has the URL field, it will attempt to download the PDF, and open it on the correct page! See the 3 minute demo below (which also includes our new experimental social Researchr server):
I think this is a pretty neat example of what is possible with OA publications. Currently, this functionality only exists in Researchr, but all the data is open and standardized (BibTeX), so other citation managers could build this in as well – and ideally, more metadata will come with the URL field filled in. In fact, maybe we need a new field, something like OA-URL, to denote both that the publication is OA, and that this is a URL that goes directly to a download, rather than to an HTML abstract. (In fact, embedding the publication license in the BibTeX metadata wouldn't be dumb either).
StianStian Håklev April 17, 2012 Toronto, Canada comments powered by Disqus