<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenEd: Week 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reganmian.net/blog/2007/10/08/opened-week-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reganmian.net/blog/2007/10/08/opened-week-7/</link>
	<description>Random stuff that I think matters. Int'l politics, linguistics, China, int'l development, society&#038;tech, culture...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: OpenEd: week 7 at Anto&#8217;stuff</title>
		<link>http://reganmian.net/blog/2007/10/08/opened-week-7/#comment-15673</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenEd: week 7 at Anto&#8217;stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reganmian.net/blog/2007/10/08/opened-week-7/#comment-15673</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week I was almost sure that CC-SA and/or CC-NC were good choices for OER. Now I have some more doubts, but I&#8217;m still sure that OER need some protection against uncontrolled wide commercial use. I now see that Stian, for example, shares my strain on this point. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week I was almost sure that CC-SA and/or CC-NC were good choices for OER. Now I have some more doubts, but I&#8217;m still sure that OER need some protection against uncontrolled wide commercial use. I now see that Stian, for example, shares my strain on this point. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://reganmian.net/blog/2007/10/08/opened-week-7/#comment-15672</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 02:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reganmian.net/blog/2007/10/08/opened-week-7/#comment-15672</guid>
		<description>OH, I just noticed that this the "热干面" you are talking about. You do a great job in this class's reading and posting your ideas. So where are you original from? Hubei? It is so cool this class bring us together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH, I just noticed that this the &#8220;热干面&#8221; you are talking about. You do a great job in this class&#8217;s reading and posting your ideas. So where are you original from? Hubei? It is so cool this class bring us together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edocet &#187; Opened, week 7</title>
		<link>http://reganmian.net/blog/2007/10/08/opened-week-7/#comment-15665</link>
		<dc:creator>edocet &#187; Opened, week 7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reganmian.net/blog/2007/10/08/opened-week-7/#comment-15665</guid>
		<description>[...] Then, a lot after the preamble, came the course on openeducation and the OER and OCW and so on&#8230; And then, week 7, the questions, the problems&#8230; Well, I acknowledge that the first reaction was &#8220;yet another week of technicalities&#8221; about copy-right-left-something else. So far so good, I begun to read and view - I also added some videos in italian language to the syllabus, so to help the italians&#8217; group&#8230; and myself. But couldn&#8217;t yet grasp the problem behind the questions given for the week. Now, thanks to the rss feeder, I found that someone else (STIAN: http://reganmian.net/blog/2007/10/08/opened-week-7/) had already &#8220;done the homeworks&#8221;. His article was really interesting to me, helped me to re-read some passages. Peculiarly I focussed my attention &#8220;As far as I understand, the reason to use CC NC is not primarily to prevent people from making money off material, but rather to avoid that open material is “re-appropriated” by commercial entities. In this case, I believe SA does provide sufficient “protection” by making sure that all “value added” is returned to the community.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Then, a lot after the preamble, came the course on openeducation and the OER and OCW and so on&#8230; And then, week 7, the questions, the problems&#8230; Well, I acknowledge that the first reaction was &#8220;yet another week of technicalities&#8221; about copy-right-left-something else. So far so good, I begun to read and view - I also added some videos in italian language to the syllabus, so to help the italians&#8217; group&#8230; and myself. But couldn&#8217;t yet grasp the problem behind the questions given for the week. Now, thanks to the rss feeder, I found that someone else (STIAN: <a href="http://reganmian.net/blog/2007/10/08/opened-week-7/" rel="nofollow">http://reganmian.net/blog/2007/10/08/opened-week-7/</a>) had already &#8220;done the homeworks&#8221;. His article was really interesting to me, helped me to re-read some passages. Peculiarly I focussed my attention &#8220;As far as I understand, the reason to use CC NC is not primarily to prevent people from making money off material, but rather to avoid that open material is “re-appropriated” by commercial entities. In this case, I believe SA does provide sufficient “protection” by making sure that all “value added” is returned to the community.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alessandro Giorni</title>
		<link>http://reganmian.net/blog/2007/10/08/opened-week-7/#comment-15660</link>
		<dc:creator>Alessandro Giorni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reganmian.net/blog/2007/10/08/opened-week-7/#comment-15660</guid>
		<description>I appreciate your comments and ideas. Thanks a lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your comments and ideas. Thanks a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
